This week, we spent some time evaluating which revenue proposal — and thus, which legislator — is the least “regressive” from a revenue perspective; turns out the answer is effectively none of them — There have been several bills filed this session that would help close all or a portion of the state’s fiscal gap through individual taxes. Most, however, have been proposals involving cuts in the Permanent Fund Dividend (PFD), what University of Alaska-Anchorage Institute of Social and Economic Research (ISER) Professor Matthew…